HomeBusiness NewsThe Tuesday Letter: Why Banks Are Dropping Jewellers, and the Other Rules...

The Tuesday Letter: Why Banks Are Dropping Jewellers, and the Other Rules That Cost Money Now

Thirty years at one bank, sixty days to leave, no reason given \u2014 de-risking, greenwashing penalties, and the traps that still catch stores

The letter arrives on a Tuesday, from a bank the store has used for thirty years. It gives sixty days, sometimes thirty, to move every account. It offers no reason. Phone calls reach a polite person with no authority. The branch manager who attended the store’s anniversary party is not allowed to comment. Across Canada, jewellers who never missed a filing are discovering that decades of loyalty mean nothing to a risk algorithm — and the algorithm decided.

Canadian jewellery regulations now cost money in three places at once. Banks are quietly de-risking jewellers as a category. Environmental claims carry penalties up to 3 per cent of worldwide revenue. And the old traps — the trademark rule, the fake “regular price” — still catch stores every year.

Why do banks close jewellers’ accounts overnight?

The practice has a name: de-risking. Rather than manage a high-risk client, the bank exits the whole category. Jewellers sit squarely in the crosshairs, because FINTRAC’s own operational brief flags dealers in precious metals and stones as a distinct laundering risk — the trade deals in small, transferable, high-value goods. Then came the hammer: TD’s roughly US$3-billion American money-laundering penalty. Since that settlement, every Canadian bank’s risk committee has tightened, and the cheapest way to reduce AML exposure is to shed the clients who create it.

The triggers are mundane. Cash intensity. A gold-buying program. Wire transfers to trading hubs the model dislikes. Adverse media about the industry, not even about you. Consequently, a store can do everything right and still receive the letter, because the decision was never about the store. And the silence has a legal reason: if a suspicious transaction report exists anywhere in the file, the bank is prohibited from telling you. It cannot explain even when it wants to.

What protects the banking relationship?

Redundancy first. Open a second full banking relationship while you do not need it, because the worst time to open an account is the month after losing one. Next, flip the compliance file from defence to offence. Every jeweller knows the $10,000 cash rules by now; the point is what the file can do at the bank. Walk your written FINTRAC program into your account manager’s office before anyone asks. A dealer who shows the bank a live compliance program, clean wire documentation, and strict separation of personal and business flows stops looking like category risk and starts looking like a managed client. Finally, answer every bank information request fast and completely. Slow answers read as evasive answers, and the algorithm is reading.

Why is “recycled gold” the riskiest phrase in the store?

Bill C-59 rewrote the Competition Act’s environmental-claims rules in 2024. Any green claim now needs substantiation, and penalties reach $10 million or 3 per cent of annual worldwide revenue. Private parties can take complaints straight to the Tribunal. The Competition Bureau has presented these expectations directly to the Canadian Jewellers Association, so nobody in this trade can claim surprise.

The jewellery problem is definitional. “Recycled gold” under prevailing certification standards can include melted bullion that was never scrap, and the responsible-sourcing bodies are openly fighting over the term. A claim built on a definition you cannot defend is exactly what the law targets. Ottawa is still adjusting the rules — Bill C-15 proposes softening parts — but the core requirement stays. So claim what you can document, in the words the documents support. “Made with gold refined by X under standard Y” survives scrutiny. “Sustainable gold” on its own invites it.

Which old traps still catch stores?

Two, reliably. The first is the trademark rule. A quality mark on a precious metal article legally requires a registered Canadian trademark applied by the same method, unless the piece was hallmarked under UK or equivalent foreign rules. Overseas suppliers stamp “14K” freely; the liability lands on the Canadian store selling the piece. Unmarked is legal. Marked-but-untrademarked is not. Our PMMA reference covers the mechanics.

The second is the permanent sale. A “regular price” must pass one of two tests: real volume sold at that price, or the price offered in good faith for a real period. The eternal half-off event against a price nothing ever sold at fails both, and the Tribunal has taken multi-million-dollar penalties from national retailers on exactly this theory. One question settles it: could you hand the Bureau your sales data for the price in your window? If that needs explaining, rewrite the ticket first.

What else sits in the file?

Three shorter items. Imports: finished jewellery under heading 71.13 carries up to 8.5 per cent duty, CUSMA-originating goods enter free with valid certification, and loose diamonds generally enter free — while classification errors surface years later in retroactive CBSA audits. Client data: clienteling programs fall under PIPEDA, with Quebec’s Law 25 the strictest regime; collect with consent, use for the stated purpose, report breaches. Gold buying: second-hand dealer rules are provincial and municipal — licensing, ID, registers, holding periods — so verify locally before advertising the program, not after.

The Monday-morning file

Five checks, one morning. Confirm a second banking relationship exists, or start one. Match every environmental claim in your marketing to a document, or rewrite it. Pull your three best-selling “regular prices” and confirm real sales at those numbers. Spot-check imported stamped goods for the trademark. And put the written compliance program in front of your bank before your bank asks for it. The store that does this chooses its risks. The rest wait for a Tuesday letter.

Frequently asked questions

Why do banks close jewellery business accounts?

De-risking: banks exit entire high-risk categories rather than manage them. FINTRAC flags precious metals dealers as a distinct laundering risk, and recent AML penalties have made Canadian banks aggressive about shedding exposure.

Can a bank close an account without explanation?

Yes. Account agreements permit closure with notice, and if a suspicious transaction report exists, the bank is legally barred from disclosing it — which is why no explanation comes.

How does a jeweller avoid being de-banked?

Maintain a second banking relationship before it is needed, show the bank a live written compliance program proactively, keep wire documentation clean, separate personal and business flows, and answer bank information requests quickly.

Can a Canadian jeweller advertise gold as recycled?

Only with substantiation. Since the 2024 Competition Act amendments, environmental claims need documentation, with penalties up to $10 million or 3 per cent of worldwide revenue.

Is a trademark required on stamped gold jewellery in Canada?

Yes — a quality-marked article needs a registered Canadian trademark applied by the same method, unless hallmarked under UK or equivalent foreign rules. The importing retailer carries the liability.

Sources: FINTRAC operational brief on dealers in precious metals and stones; Competition Bureau presentation to the Canadian Jewellers Association; Miller Thomson on Bill C-59; Competition Bureau PMMA guide; CBSA Customs Tariff.

This guide is general information for the trade, not legal advice. Consult counsel on specific compliance questions.

Editor
Author: Editor

RELATED ARTICLES

CJ SOCIAL MEDIA

GOLD DEPOT

GET OUR APP

Get our APP for Canadian Jeweller Magazine!Get our APP for Canadian Jeweller Magazine!

Most Popular